Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 37409

Lawmakers Debate Whether Minors Should Be Punished As Adults For Heinous Crimes

$
0
0
NEW DELHI -- Agitation and unease over the release of the youngest person convicted for the Delhi Gang Rape on Sunday forced lawmakers to take a break from the political brouhaha, which has eclipsed this Winter Session, and debate a Bill that will allow courts to punish minors as adults for heinous crimes.

The Rajya Sabha today debated a law which will allow 16- to 18-year-old offenders in heinous crimes to be punished as adults, with the exception of the death penalty.

Under the bill, a Juvenile Justice Board will decide whether the juvenile, convicted of a heinous crime like murder or rape, has an adult mindset.

The Bharatiya Janata Party-majority Lok Sabha passed the amendments to juvenile justice law in May.

"I can't make separate jails for rapists, murderers and Kashmiri terrorists," said Union Cabinet Minister for Women and Child Development Maneka Gandhi, who introduced the Bill. "Do we really think they are children?"

Describing the Bill as "nuanced," Gandhi said that convicted minors can appeal against the Juvenile Justice Board's decision to treat them as adults, and they will be sent to a borstal instead of a jail until they turned 21, after which there will be a review. "Are we going to protect the victims or are we going to protect the rapists," she said.

'Piecemeal Remedy.... Backward Step'

On December 16, 2012, a physiotherapy student was brutally raped by a minor and five adults, who assaulted her with an iron road and threw her off the bus without any clothes. While the 23-year-old fought for her life in hospital, massive demonstrations for justice and women's safety erupted in the capital.

The nation came to call her Nirbhaya (fearless) for trying hard to fend off the men and cooperating with the police despite her horrific injuries. She died on Dec. 29, 2012.

While expressing their abject sympathy with parents of Nirbhaya, lawmakers speaking against the Bill outnumbered those speaking in favour. They underlined the futility of lowering the age as a deterrent, and emphasized the need for India to take better care of its children by providing them love, care, opportunities and resources.

Nationalist Congress Party's Vandana Chavan said that India had failed to protect its women and children, and this law was the shortest possible route to give a false perception of safety. Chavan asked how would overcrowded jails serve the needs of children.

Quoting U.S. actor Jessica Lang, who served as a UNICEF goodwill ambassador, she said, "There can be no better measure of our governance than the way we treat our children, and no greater failing on our part than to allow them to be subjected to violence, abuse or exploitation."

Nirbhaya's parents observed the debate in the Rajya Sabha today.

“Why are children becoming like this,” said Ravi Prakash Verma, from the Samajwadi Party. "Media is harping on one incident (Delhi Gang Rape). There are children who are living a worse life than death. How can the media ignore this?"

"I won't agree to a piecemeal remedy," he said.

READ: Why The Juvenile Deserves A Second Chance


While public support for harsher punishment for minors has been growing since the Delhi Gang Rape, human rights groups fundamentally opposed legislating tougher penalties on juveniles since it contradicts universal standards.

In 2000, the age of juveniles was raised from 16 to 18 in India to conform to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. It was Gandhi who pushed changed the definition to 18 years.

"We should be discussing about the horrible condition of juvenile homes. Lowering age will be a backward step, said Anu Aga, Indian businesswoman and education activist. "India is a signatory to the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child. We should honour our commitment."

"Changing from 16 to 18 and 18 to 16 is not the solution. Why don't you just do 12-13," said Kahkasha Praveen, a lawmaker from Janata Dal (United). "Our objective should be to improve the lives of children."

Speaking in favour of passing the Bill, Trinamool Congress Parliamentary Party's Derek O'Brien said, "It is a good bill, let's not wait for perfect."

READ: Humanising The Juvenile Rapist Risks Turning Him Into A Victim And That's Unfair To Jyoti Singh


On Monday, the Supreme Court dismissed a petition against the release of the youngest person convicted for the Delhi Gang Rape, who was a minor when he sexually assaulted a physiotherapy student on December 16, 2012.

"If this law had passed six months ago then that criminal would not be outside. Better late than never," Asha Devi, the mother, said before the Rajya Sabha session today.

The law does not apply retrospectively to the youngest person convicted in the Delhi Gang Rape.

"If a child of 15 years, 11 months commits then will you change the law again," said Ritabrata Banerjee from the Communist Party of India (Marxist). "It is retrogressive in nature."

Banerjee also asked how the Juvenile Justice Committee would determine whether a child was thinking like an adult or a child.

Death Penalty For Others

While one accused was found hanging from his prison cell before the Delhi Gang Rape trial could be completed, the other four adults were found guilty of rape and murder, and sentenced to death in September, 2013.

The minor was sentenced to three years in a correctional facility, which is the maximum punishment allowed for minors under Indian law.

The Delhi High Court confirmed capital punishment for the four men, but the Supreme Court has stayed their execution until it reaches a final decision on their appeals.



Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |
Contact HuffPost India


Also on HuffPost:



Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 37409

Trending Articles