Quantcast
Channel: Huffington Post India
Viewing all 37409 articles
Browse latest View live

Teen Cancer Survivor Raped By Three Men Within A Span Of Few Hours Near Lucknow

$
0
0

In a horrific case of violence against a minor, a 15-year-old survivor of blood cancer was raped twice in a span of two hours by three men in the the outskirts of Lucknow.

The police told Hindustan Times that on Saturday that the girl was first raped by her neighbour and his friend, then by a man who she sought help from after being raped.

Reports suggest that the passerby has been arrested by the police, while the other two accused are still on the run.

The incident took place when the girl stepped out to by groceries.

The Indian Express quoted a police officer as saying, "While the girl, a patient of initial stage blood cancer, was on her way, an acquaintance told her he would drop her to the market on his bike. But instead of the market, he took her to an abandoned puliya (small bridge), where he and one of his friends allegedly raped her and left her on the roadside."

When the girl tried to get help from the third accused, identified as Virendra Yadav of Banthara, instead of dropping her home he raped her and left her on the roadside.

The Hindustan Times report says that the residents of the area spotted the girl and informed the police after which her parents were informed.

The Times of India reports that girls father lodged a complaint at the Sarojininagar police station on Sunday.

The report said that the other two accused, named by the girl, are Shubham and Sumit.

Reports suggest that the girl has gone through medical check ups and is also going to be sent for counselling.

The Indian Express report said an FIR has been registered under Section 376-D (gang rape) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 5G/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.


5-Year-Old Girl From Haryana Raped And Tortured To Death, Wooden Stick Thrust Inside Her Vagina

$
0
0
Indian social activists shouts slogans against the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi during a protest after the rape of a four-year-old girl in New Delhi on October 13, 2015.

Another horrific report of rape and murder from Haryana of a five-year-old girl confirms that despite the cyclical media and civil society outrage, cities continue to be unsafe for women and children. In the latest case of sexual violence, the child from Haryana's Hisar was raped and tortured to death. A wooden stick was found thrust in her vagina with such force that it caused serious injuries to her uterus and intestine – a horrific reminder of the Delhi gang-rape of a physiotherapist on a moving bus in December in 2012.

"I slept at 9 pm along with my children. When I woke up in the morning, my daughter wasn't there... I couldn't find her. I asked the neighbours, they said they haven't seen her. Then someone told me that your daughter has been killed. I got to know about this at 7 am," the girl's mother told reporters.

The girl's body was found in a pool of blood with injuries on her shoulders, waist and nose. Police have not ruled out gang-rape but no one has been arrested yet.

Reetu Gupta, the doctor who conducted the post mortem, told India Today: "The victim died due to the torture perpetrated by inserting wooden stick into her private parts. The stick was inserted with force which not only caused serious injuries inside uterus but also in the intestine."

The report said the family of the victim has refused to cremate the body until the culprit is arrested.

The family was living in a make-shift tent and the child's father, a rag-picker, was away in Delhi.

Five years ago, on the night of 16 December, Jyoti Singh, 23, was returning from a movie in Delhi with a male friend when the couple was assaulted by six people on the bus they had boarded. Singh was raped and an iron rod was inserted into her vagina, that ruptured her intestine. Her friend was thrashed and the two were thrown out of the moving bus. She died of her injuries. The case resulted in an outpouring of anger and led to crucial changes in India's rape laws.

A National Crime Record Bureau (NCRB) report for 2015 showed that Haryana recorded the highest rate of gang-rapes per lakh woman population in the country, followed by Rajasthan.

JK Rowling's Defense Of Johnny Depp Is A Betrayal Of The Women Who Broke Their Silence

$
0
0
Author J.K. Rowling attends the premiere of

JK Rowling, one of the internet's sanest voices, a writer who has consistently been a vociferous champion of women's rights and social equality, recently broke her silence on a controversy that has shadowed her for a while now – the casting of Johnny Depp as Grindelwald in Warner Brothers' Fantastic Beasts series.

For those not in the know, in 2016, Depp's personal life took a tumultuous turn as his then wife, actress Amber Heard, accused him of physically and verbally abusing her during the course of their nearly 4-year-long relationship. In May 2016, she filed for divorce, even providing photographic evidence of physical assault, after Depp struck her face with a cellphone.

Heard's friend, iO Tillet Wright, who witnessed the violence first-hand, in an essay for Refinery 29, wrote, 'The reports of violence started with a kick on a private plane, then it was shoves and the occasional punch, until finally, in December, she (Heard) described an all-out assault and she woke up with her pillow covered in blood. I know this because I went to their house. I saw the pillow with my own eyes. I saw the busted lip and the clumps of hair on the floor."

In her sworn court declaration, Heard stated, "Johnny has a long-held and widely-acknowledged public and private history of drug and alcohol abuse. He has a short fuse. He is often paranoid and his temper is extremely scary for me as it has proven many times to be physically dangerous and/or life-threatening to me."

The Los Angeles judge hearing the case found the evidence compelling enough to grant Heard a restraining order against Depp.

After their divorce, Heard and Depp issued a statement, which Heard re-posted after Rowling' wrote her defense of Depp.

Johnny Depp and his actress wife Amber Heard arrive for the British premiere of the film "Black Mass" in London, Britain October 11, 2015. REUTERS/Suzanne Plunkett/File Photo

After Heard's claims dominated the news cycle, Potter fans expressed genuine concern about the casting of Depp in the Fantastic Beasts franchise. Rowling, until now, had maintained a stoic silence on the matter even as her Twitter feed was cluttered with fans expressing a desire to get him removed. Rowling never said a word. In fact, when one Twitter user, @hobbitlindsey, questioned Depp's participation in the movies and Rowling's silence on the controversy, she was blocked by the author, a rather uncharacteristic move.

As someone who has never shied away from engaging politically (she was a vocal critic of Brexit and routinely calls out Trump) or shaming sexist trolls, haters, bigots, xenophobes, and body-shamers, Rowling's meek defense of Depp is uniquely disappointing, convenient and inconsistent with her fiercely liberal and progressive worldview.

Here's Rowling's complete statement:

JK Rowling's statement on Johnny Depp's inclusion in the Fantastic Beasts series.

As we've seen, in a post-Weinstein era, there's a significantly higher consciousness of the effects and implications of male violence and sexual abuse. At least in the entertainment industry, (Al Franken may have grudgingly resigned but don't forget accused paedophile Roy Moore is still running for Senate and Donald Trump is still the President of the United States), there's a legitimate reckoning as more and more women come forward to share stories of abuse and an increasing number of powerful men face very real consequences for their past actions.

In that context, Rowling's statement, where she asserts that she's 'not only comfortable sticking with our original casting, but genuinely happy to have Johnny playing a major character in the movies' is a massive setback for what feels like a legitimate and much-needed revolution. When she says, she's 'genuinely happy' with her choice, she has chosen to disbelieve a woman who suffered violently at Depp's hands. When she selectively quotes Heard on having expressed a desire to 'move on,' she's consciously ignoring the part where Heard wrote that 'neither party made false accusations.'

It's one thing to call out perpetuators of abuse when there's nothing personally at stake, but quite another when there are serious financial as well as social ramifications.

It's one thing to call out perpetuators of abuse when there's nothing personally at stake, but quite another when there are serious financial as well as social ramifications. The women who came forward to share their stories risked all of that, and much more, and Rowling's support of Depp belittles their courage and insidiously stifles their collective voices.

It also delegitimizes their struggle.

Rowling, in the past, has made her position clear on Weinstein, although not directly.

On 11 October, she quote tweeted a tweet from Trump's Former Deputy Assistant, Sebastian Gorka, where he said, 'THINK: If Weinstein had obeyed @VP Pence's rules for meeting with the opposite sex, none of those poor women would ever have been abused.'

(Pence's rules for meeting with women is to never do it alone)

Rowling responded to it, saying, "If the only thing preventing a man committing sexual assault is the presence of witnesses, he's too dangerous to be at liberty."

But calling out a sexual predator when there are no real financial or legal consequence to you is far easier than calling out an abuser, whose inclusion or exclusion, directly affects your economic advancement.

Times such as these are the true test of how far you can go to defend your ideals and more importantly, how consistent your actions are with your projected ideals. A moral dilemma such as the one Rowling faced -- to choose between perceived commercial gains or take an ethical stand -- reveals if she believes in championing causes or it's mere lip-service/a PR exercise.

Today, Rowling is in a position of power, where she can influence the decision of a mammoth studio to get Depp dropped and replaced with another, a more credible A-lister – if that's one of the reasons to continue having him in the film. By doing so, she could've set perhaps the most solid example, after Kevin Spacey's firing from one of Netflix's top-performing show, House of Cards, and emboldened the efforts of several hundred women who still fear calling out their aggressors for the fear of sabotaging their careers.

And if Netflix can act, why can't Warner Bros? And it's not just Netflix, it's a whole lot of corporate giants who're part of the awakening.

In an unprecedented move, Sony allowed Ridley Scott to reshoot the Kevin Spacey-starrerAll The Money in the World after the film was fully complete. NBC fired top-ratings drawer, Today show host Matt Lauer, Amazon dropped its studio head, Roy Price. HBO has cut all ties with Louis CK. (Here's a list of at least 40 men who've lost their jobs/resigned after allegations of sexual misconduct came about).

Why should Depp be absolved of his transgressions and continue to be recruited in top projects? Especially when the degree of his transgressions is much severe, the timing of the event recent, and the the evidence, overwhelmingly clear?

We need men to lose.

We need men to realise that there are consequences, economic, social, legal and otherwise. Society doesn't owe these men rehabilitation, that's their and their battle alone. And what it definitely doesn't need to do -- like Rowling's decision quite actively has -- is to enable their economic advancement and contribute in refurbishing their image by consciously glossing over their very serious moral and potentially legal offenses.

Now, more than ever before, we need this reckoning to continue. To win. To validate the difficult truths of all those women who suppressed traumatic memories with unimaginable courage and risked re-traumatization by choosing to open up.

And Rowling, along with us, let them down too.

It's deeply wounding to be disappointed by somebody you've idolized. It not only saddens you, it thwarts your little reservoir of idealism. It's disenchanting when your heroes leave you with a profound sense of betrayal. But perhaps we need to shift our idea of what constitutes a hero, just like we have of what definitely doesn't constitute one.

A hero cannot be a projected version of our collective fantasies, who we, as hopeful followers and worshippers of literature and cinema, put on a pedestal they never signed up to be put on.

A hero cannot be an armchair hashtag activist.

A hero has to be one who champions causes, uses all the tools available to them to enable social change, and calls out a bully, a harasser, a predator, even if it comes at a commercial disadvantage.

For a writer who made an incredible career by authoring a story about a boy who survived abuse, it's heartbreaking to see Rowling defend a man, who, in all likelihood, perpetuated it.

For all its magic, the Harry Potter universe, primarily, is built on the premise of standing up to bullies.

Sadly, it's author today is complicit in encouraging one.

As the great wizard Dumbledore once said, "Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right."

For now, we know the choice Rowling made. It's a choice she'll have to live with.

Also see on HuffPost:

Anushka Sharma Gets Married To Cricketer Virat Kohli In Italy And The Pictures Are Gorgeous

$
0
0

In what has turned out to be the most-discussed event of the year, Virat Kohli and Anushka Sharma have tied the knot in Italy.

The ceremony took place early in the morning in the presence of family and some close friends.

After meeting during the shoot of a shampoo commercial, Virat and Anushka dated each other steadily for several years. The two have also jointly bought a property in Worli, Mumbai, where they'll move in once back in Mumbai.

According to their spokesperson, the couple will be hosting a reception in New Delhi for their relatives on 21st December which will be followed by a reception for industry friends and cricketers in Mumbai on 26th December.

The newly wed couple will travel to South Africa where Virat will start prepping for upcoming series and Anushka will spend New Year's Eve with him and return in first week of January to begin next schedule of a film with Shah Rukh Khan in Mumbai.

The spokesperson said that Anushka will also start prepping for Sui Dhaaga as the shooting for the same starts in February 2018 with Varun Dhawan. Anushka will also be busy with the marketing and promotions of Pari which is releasing on February 9.

Here's wishing the couple a happy married life.

Suspect Captured In 'Terror-Related' Explosion Near New York's Port Authority Bus Terminal

$
0
0

NEW YORK ― City police captured an injured suspect in what they called a “terror-related incident” after a pipe bomb strapped to his body exploded in the transit system near Times Square during Monday’s morning rush hour.

The improvised, low-tech device was affixed to the bomber’s chest with Velcro and zip ties and left the suspect the most seriously hurt among four people who were treated, authorities said. The blast, about 7:15 a.m. in the subway near Eighth Avenue and 42nd Street, immediately plunged the commuter hub into chaos.

Police identified the suspect as Akayed Ullah, 27, and said he made a statement mentioning the so-called Islamic State. Ullah, who had burns on his hands and abdomen, and lacerations, triggered the bomb intentionally, authorities said. He was seized by police and taken to Bellevue Hospital for treatment. Media reports said Ullah is a Bangladesh national who had been living in Brooklyn. 

Three other people were treated for minor injuries, including headaches and ringing in the ears, authorities said.

Police Commissioner James O’Neill called the explosion a “terror-related incident” during a mid-morning news conference. He declined to elaborate on Ullah’s statement.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo described the explosive as a “low-tech device,” which officials said was based on a pipe bomb. 

Terrorists “yearn to attack New York City,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said. “All we know of is one individual who, thank God, was unsuccessful in his aims.”

The blast immediately sent the key transit hub into chaos. The A, C and E subway lines were evacuated, Sgt. Brendan Ryan told HuffPost, and the busy Port Authority bus terminal was cleared and temporarily shut down. Other trains bypassed Times Square and Port Authority stations.

The area where the explosion occurred is one of New York City’s busiest tourist and commuter zones. The Times Square-42nd Street/Port Authority station serves a dozen subway lines and a variety of local and regional bus lines.

Rosemary Usoh, 40, told HuffPost she was on the third floor of bus terminal around 7:15 a.m. when at least a dozen police officers with automatic weapons shouted for people to evacuate the building immediately.

“They yelled at us to get out, that there was an explosion,” Usoh said. “I was nervous. There were a lot of people running.”

Alicja Wlodkowski, 51, told The New York Times that she was in a restaurant inside the bus terminal building when the explosion occurred.

“A woman fell, and nobody even stopped to help her because it was so crazy,” Wlodkowski said. “Then it all slowed down. I was standing and watching and scared.” 

Video shows emergency crews responding to the Port Authority bus terminal on 42nd Street. Police said the blast was in the subway system.

The Port Authority said the subway entrance outside the building on Eighth Avenue was closed “due to police activity.” The bus terminal building was evacuated and shut down for several hours. It reopened later in the morning, but the Port Authority warned bus commuters to “contact their carrier for the most current information.”

Police closed surrounding streets.

President Donald Trump reportedly was briefed.

Also on HuffPost
Port Authority Bus Terminal Explosion

White House Calls CNN 'Fake News' After Outlet Mixed Up 2 Indian-Americans

$
0
0
Raj Shah on the left served in the Obama administration. Raj Shah on the right handles communications in the Trump White House.

The White House laid into CNN after the news outlet mixed up the photos of two men named Shah on Friday. 

While displaying a quote from Raj Shah, who serves as President Donald Trump’s principal deputy press secretary, CNN showed an image of Dr. Rajiv Shah, who was an official in the Obama administration. 

White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders attacked the news outlet Friday evening as “fake news.” 

The quote from the principal deputy press secretary addressed Trump’s endorsement of Roy Moore, the Republican Alabama Senate candidate faces multiple accusations of preying on teenage girls decades ago.

“The President tweeted earlier today, and he’s been saying for a while now that his endorsement of Roy Moore has to do with the issues and the fact that he doesn’t want Alabama to elect somebody who’d essentially be a Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer puppet and vote against this President’s agenda on a whole host of issues,” Shah said. 

The Raj Shah whom CNN erroneously featured on screen is currently president of the Rockefeller Foundation and served as administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development from 2010 to 2015.

The Raj Shah who now works for Trump ran opposition research for the Republican National Committee in 2016.

Pointing out the very different backgrounds of the two men, Twitter users joined in clapping back at CNN for the flub. 

In case people need a reminder: Not all Asians look the same.

When will they ever learn ... 

Why A New Yorker Short Story About Bad Sex Went Viral

$
0
0

We’ve developed a pretty clear idea, by the Year of Our Lord 2017, of what should go viral on social media. Body-positive clapbacks. Video clips of hamsters eating tiny burritos. Bizarre optical illusions. Searing takedowns of Donald Trump (bonus points if published by unexpected outlets like Teen Vogue or Outdoor Magazine). Invitingly tone-deaf first-person essays.

Fiction? No, fiction isn’t on the list of things to go viral. At least until this weekend, when The New Yorker dropped “Cat Person” by Kristen Roupenian on the internet and sauntered away like an action star silhouetted in front of an explosion. What happened? Why did “Cat Person” catch fire while so many other great New Yorker stories have, comparatively, fizzled? 

In scouting the story, before reading it, I’ll admit I thought that all the kerfuffle was because The New Yorker had published a daring genre romance about a shape-shifting cat/person and a human. (I blame the creepily ambiguous image of a kiss attached to the story.) It turns out “Cat Person” fascinated people for something else: the uncomfortable, unflinching realness with which it depicts a murky, troubling sexual encounter between a young woman and a man she recently began dating.

It's alarming.

Roupenian’s story, if you haven’t read it, is about a college student named Margot who starts texting with Robert, a man who frequents the artsy movie theater where she works. Eventually the two go on a date; it goes rather poorly, but she still ends up back at his place. Once there, her sexual desire for him starts to fade, but she decides she’d rather have sex with him than face an awkward and involved conversation about why she doesn’t want to anymore. She has the sex she doesn’t want to have, she leaves and she stops texting with Robert ― who, spoiler alert, does not handle the rejection gracefully.

The story hit at just the right moment ― amid the #MeToo reckoning, as our society has been consumed by questions of sexual discomfort, misconduct and the toxic state of our scripts around male-female interactions.

This particular story doesn’t concern sexual abuse or harassment, it doesn’t concern workplace abuse or rape, but it does take a look at people’s inability to read each other, inability to read each other sexually,” New Yorker fiction editor Deborah Treisman told HuffPost in a phone conversation on Monday. 

The fortuitous timing, by the way, was no accident. “We had [the story] in hand for a few weeks, and yes, the subject is topical,” Treisman said, “so we felt it would be a good time. We didn’t want to hold on to it for months.”

To people who frequent certain neighborhoods of Twitter (Book Twitter, but also Feminism Twitter and Media Twitter), the story seemed to be everywhere, along with that unsettling image. Nor was its ubiquity an illusion. “Of all the fiction we published this year, ‘Cat Person’ was by far the most-read online,” Natalie Raabe, the magazine’s director of communications, told HuffPost. “It’s also one of our most-read pieces overall for the year.”

So it was timely ― but there have been timely short stories before. What is the special appeal of “Cat Person”?

For one thing, it reads quite similarly to another viral-friendly form: the first-person confessional essay, as propagated by outlets like xoJane and Jezebel. Plenty of Twitter readers, rather tellingly, referred to it as an article or an essay, rather than a short story. “Cat Person” unfolds in a sort of transparent prose that’s not demonstratively artful; it’s easy to lose oneself in, and to get wrapped up in Margot’s neuroses and imagined realities, much as one focuses on the psychological revelations in a New York Times Modern Love column rather than the structure or the use of adjectives. Roupenian’s story is the fiction version of “It Happened to Me: I Had Bad Sex Because It Felt Awkward to Say No.”

The ubiquity of these essays, in a slightly earlier Internet Age, owed a great deal to the economic considerations of web media, as they require no reporting or expertise and yet tap into the reptilian click-and-share node of our brains. Though The New Yorker’s Jia Tolentino bid farewell to the form earlier this year, it will never entirely leave us. We will always be interested in how other people find love, break up, find balls of cat hair in their vaginas. (Sorry, that happened.)

In fact, “Cat Person” specifically tapped into a need that those xoJane personal essays also fulfilled: honest, vulnerable narration of women’s real-life experience. So much about women’s lives and bodies is framed as shameful, embarrassing. We’re taught to hide our periods, fake orgasms and say yes to a date so as not to hurt a guy’s feelings. How liberating it can be to share what we’re hiding with each other and find out that other women aren’t clean, kind, gentle paragons ― they’re complicated, shallow, misguided and sometimes gross, just like us.  

That “Cat Person” dove deep into a young woman’s consciousness, narrating the female side of a messy, disappointing sexual encounter between a man and a woman, struck many readers as refreshing. (That the young woman was a college student, and her experience a familiar one to the predominantly white, well-educated, financially well-off women who likely make up much of The New Yorker’s readership, could only have helped the story strike a nerve among the target audience.) There’s a wealth of short fiction by men, about men’s desultory sexual doings. Then again, there’s also plenty of great short fiction by women, about women having sex and relationships ― Lorrie Moore and Mary Gaitskill are just a couple of classic examples.

But unlike so many other excellent short stories about dating, sex and female interiority, Roupenian’s story ― her first for The New Yorker ― hit at a moment when we were all primed and ready to talk about it. The specific timeliness of the #MeToo moment combined with the other appeals of “Cat Person” to create an alchemical appeal.

“I’m sure [the response] does have something to do with the nature of our discourse right now, about sex, about consent,” said Treisman. “Those kinds of issues are so much in the news and in the air right now that this was a way to look at them, somewhat away from the political sphere, and the sphere of Hollywood producers and so on.”

Though, as she points out, women having these experiences is not new, it can’t be denied that we’re talking about all of those experiences, past and present, with particular avidity now. It’s as if we all signed up for a seminar on women’s bad sexual experiences with men and we’re halfway through the semester; the early foundational reading has been completed, and now we’re all on the same page. That doesn’t mean we all agree ― on the contrary, “Cat Person” Twitter was pretty divided on even questions so basic as whether Robert or Margot deserved more sympathy ― but we all recognize this story as a clear opportunity to talk about consent, communication and women’s sexual pleasure. If the same story came out six months ago, it would have been the same story, but there wouldn’t have been the same shared understanding of its resonance.

Sad as it might be to admit, a big part of the viral success of “Cat Person” might be, simply, that a work of short fiction has never really gone viral on social media before. Early on, the online conversation surrounding it was a meta-conversation: Isn’t it cool that a short story is getting read? Why is this short story getting read? Is everyone so excited because they’ve never read a short story before and don’t realize how great they can be? How can we get more short stories to go viral in the future? No post-”Cat Person” story will enjoy quite the same novelty.

Treisman, for her part, seemed as surprised as anyone by the story’s burst of popularity ― and she couldn’t put her finger on how to replicate it with future works of fiction. “In terms of the way that word spreads through social media,” she said, “that’s still something of a novelty to me at least. I’m not sure how to game it.” 

But we’ve been here before and had these same conversations ― about poetry. When Patricia Lockwood’s “Rape Joke” blew up in the summer of 2013 (tellingly, it also drew in readers with its vivid, uncensored representation of a woman’s interior experience of an interaction with a man), many were flabbergasted that a poem could go viral. The Guardian credited the poem with having “casually reawakened a generation’s interest in poetry.” In the years since, poetry has only continued to strengthen its new readership, particularly online. Nowadays, a poem going viral isn’t all that noteworthy ― it happens often enough. Poetry has become a staple in how we respond to and process events on the Internet, providing a different angle on the world we live in than can a think piece or a breaking news item.

Why can’t short fiction be like that? There are artistic purists who leap to defend the sanctity of literature from such crass things as “messages” or “political relevance.” Any discussion of which character was in the right, or who behaved selfishly or whether the story fat-shamed Robert is framed as improperly treating fiction as nonfiction. “It’s inevitable that some readers view ‘Cat Person’ as weighing in on a timely issue and offering up lessons, the way personal essays are so often inclined to do,” sighed Laura Miller in Slate. “It’s easy to get into the habit of thinking that every imaginative literary work must be made to carry an unambiguous moral.”

But there’s a reason people read the story that way: It’s offering a very realistic narrative of a communication breakdown between two real-seeming people, teasing out the ways in which things went wrong. Of course we’ll want to take lessons from that, if we can. “Cat Person,” though written well before the #MeToo moment and worth reading outside of it, does offer particular relief and insight to readers in the grip of this cultural moment, just as an essay might. Roupenian and Treisman, who both emphasized the story’s ability to speak to our current consternation over dysfunctional male-female communication, seem to be embracing the political relevance of the work.  

In an interview with Treisman for The New Yorker, Roupenian explained that Margot’s resignation to sex she no longer wanted “speaks to the way that many women, especially young women, move through the world: not making people angry, taking responsibility for other people’s emotions, working extremely hard to keep everyone around them happy.” In an interview with The New York Times this week, she elaborated on the loneliness women who date men might feel, having a partner, at this moment in time, who doesn’t understand their feelings of sexual vulnerability. “That’s a pain a lot of women I know have felt acutely, especially in this past year, when all of these terrible shared experiences are becoming part of the public conversation,” Roupenian said. “Women try to talk about these experiences with their partners, and they find themselves failing. It’s an isolating feeling for both people involved.” 

And while we should certainly remember the story is fiction (no, Margot and Roupenian are not the same person) and can analyze the story as a carefully crafted imaginative work, it’s hard to see what’s wrong with also discussing it as a window into a real-world problem, as Roupenian does in these interviews. That’s exactly what makes it so appealing, and what has long been one of fiction’s strengths ― especially psychological realism.

That’s not to say that fiction should trade in simplistic moral archetypes. As Miller points out, “Cat Person” resists easy judgments of its characters and instead shows two complex, flawed people. That makes it all the more valuable of a teaching tool. Real life, too, is messy and peopled by complex, flawed humans, but real life is where we have to live.

Government Bans Condom Ads On TV Between 6 AM And 10 PM Because They Are 'Inappropriate For Children'

$
0
0

NEW DELHI -- India imposed restrictions on Monday on advertising condoms on television, saying ads would only be allowed late at night as they could be inappropriate viewing for children.

The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting said condom advertisements will now be allowed only between 10 pm and 6 am to avoid exposing children to such material and to comply with government rules.

The ministry told all television channels in an advisory "not to telecast the advertisements of condoms, which are for a particular age group and could be indecent/inappropriate for viewing by children".

The government said its decision was based on rules stating that no advertisements which "endanger the safety of children or create in them any interest in unhealthy practices" should be allowed. It also cited regulations that prohibit "indecent, vulgar, suggestive, repulsive or offensive themes".

Talking openly about sex and contraception is still largely taboo in India. Conservative social norms mean many men and women are still embarrassed to shop for condoms, whose usage remains low in rural areas of the country.

The Indian government provides free condoms under its community-based AIDS prevention programme, but several brands -- including Durex condoms of Britain's Reckitt Benckiser -- are widely available, with some endorsed by Bollywood actors.

In September, an Indian condom maker was forced to withdraw a new advertisement promoting the use of the prophylactic ahead of a major Hindu festival, local media reported.


Daredevil 'Rooftopper' Plunges 62 Stories To His Death

$
0
0

An incredibly agile Chinese social media star and fearless “rooftopper” plunged 62 floors to his death from a high-rise in the city of Changsha, police confirmed to Chinese media. He captured his fatal fall on a video camera he had set up.

Wu Yongning, 26, was doing pull-ups at the top of the Huayuan Hua Center when he seemed to lose strength, then his grip, and fell, the video, which has gone viral, shows. (The video above does not show his fall.)

The accident apparently occurred last month, although it wasn’t until a week ago that Wu’s girlfriend posted a notice on social media about his death, according to a Washington Post report linked to the Chinese-language site Sina.com. Authorities are calling it an accident and have ruled out sabotage, according to The Sun.

Wu had amassed a million followers on the Chinese social media platform Weibo while posting death-defying videos of himself in precarious positions at the top of very tall buildings without any safety equipment. By the time of his death, he had videotaped about 300 stunts. Some of the videos are available here

Wu suddenly disappeared from Weibo in early November, and his girlfriend later confirmed that he had died in a fall. He plunged from the Changsha building in  Hunan province while participating in a contest to win $15,000, according to Chinese media, which offered no further information about the competition.

Wu, from Ningxiang in Hunan, planned to propose to his girlfriend the day after the contest, a family member told the South China Morning Post. He also reportedly hoped to use his expected winnings to help his ill mother.

Wu, who had martial arts training, had worked as a movie extra. He left the job to focus full time on rooftopping, and often appeared in social media advertisements.

Wu was careful to warn people in each one of his videos not to try to imitate his stunts.

Rooftopping has slowly grown in popularity in urban landscapes in recent years. The demanding “spot” draws participants to the summits of the city in search of the ultimate social media photo.

Also on HuffPost

In The Age Of Competitive Hindutva Politics, Young Muslims Want A Hardik Patel Of Their Own

$
0
0
Orphaned children study at the Jamiat Children's Village orphanage in Anjar town, about 380 km (236 miles) west from the western Indian city of Ahmedabad February 21, 2007.

AHMEDABAD, Gujarat -- As we wrapped up our conversation one evening a couple of days ago, Mujahid Nafees placed a bet in jest. However, I was convinced he'd lose. While I was trying to book a taxi from some of the popular cab aggregators, the 35-year-old political activist from Ahmedabad challenged that if my driver turned out to be a Hindu, he would not pick me up from this house in Juhapura, seven kilometres away from the main city.

In the 15 years following the communal riots that ravaged Ahmedabad, Muslims of all stripes have flooded Juhapura. Notwithstanding their economic status, scarred Muslims started descending upon the locality presumably out of fear and the desire to stick together in case of contingencies. Once a moderately populated neighborhood on the outskirts of the city, the area is now home to over 400,000 Muslims. Locals call it the largest "Muslim ghetto" of Gujarat. While there are conflicting accounts of the exact population of pre-riots Juhapura, it is unanimously agreed upon that it burgeoened after 2002.

As I struggled to get a cab to come to Juhapura and multiple requests to various cab providers got rejected, Nafees sipped his tea and occasionally smiled. Then, as I found myself in the midst of a heated exchange with a driver who refused to come to the locality, he broke into a bout of laughter.

The activist had won the bet.

As we flagged an auto-rickshaw down half an hour later, he added, "I'm not saying no Hindu driver ever comes here, but a majority of them in our experience don't. Most of them call this locality 'Pakistan', this is our reality."

As the auto-rickshaw left Juhapura and made its way into the Hindu-dominated locality of Vejalpur, Nafees joked, "You've just crossed the Wagah border. You're in India now."

They say our neighborhood is Pakistan. This is our reality.

Disillusionment with Congress

In Ahmedabad, the religious divide between Hindus and Muslims is not only chiseled into its geography, it also finds its way into every conversation. There has been no concerted political effort to bridge this chasm. Instead, the Bharatiya Janata Party has for decades thrived on the religious polarization in the state. And in this poll season, probably inspired by the stupendous success of BJP's strategy not just in Gujarat but also in the country, Congress seems to have embraced the idea that they only need the support of the Hindus to win an election in the state.

Marking a departure from their usual poll strategy, the Congress seems to have completely buried the memory of atrocities perpetrated on Muslims in the state. The party which ruffled more than just a few feathers when Sonia Gandhi called Narendra Modi 'maut ka saudagar' (merchant of death) during the 2007 assembly elections, has gone eerily quiet on issues faced by the community in this year's campaigning.

While their manifesto has a line about implementing the Sachar Committee report and promises to work towards the development of all minorities, it doesn't specifically address issues faced by marginalized Muslims in the state.

In contrast, Rahul Gandhi has set out on a temple-visiting spree, clearly designed to find him favour with the Hindu majority in the state.The party has fielded six Muslim candidates, one less than the number they fielded in the 2007 and 2012 polls. Interestingly, while the BJP has fielded zero candidates, local Muslim leaders say that the Hindu nationalists have held more meetings with them under the radar than the Congress. BJP has never given a ticket to a Muslim candidate from the state since 1995.

BJP has never given a ticket to a Muslim candidate from the state since 1995.

Six candidates are hardly representative of a community that constitutes nine percent of the state population. In contrast, the Congress has fielded at least 35 candidates from the Patel community, which constitutes 14 percent of the state's population.

Dealing with political marginalisation has become a way of life for Muslims in Gujarat. Every election, a majority of them have voted for Congress in the hope of beating the BJP. But the 2017 election is quite the turning point -- of an unpleasant sort -- for them. Being ignored by both the national parties has acted as a wake-up call for several young Muslims in Gujarat.

In the age of competitive Hindutva, the younger generation of Muslims has realized that they have to come up with an alternative strategy to battle political redundancy. With the rise of Hardik Patel and Jignesh Mevani from the Patidar and Dalit communities respectively, who have challenged the status quo in the BJP bastion, young Muslims are asking how their own community can throw up such leaders.

In the age of competitive Hindutva, the younger generation of Muslims has realized that they have to come up with an alternative strategy to battle political redundancy.

Nafees, who leads an initiative called the Minority Coordination Committee, tells me, "The question now is how can we get into the mainstream when both political parties have pushed us to the fringes. This is an extreme situation. Imagine if this model -- the model of tossing us aside-- actually works for political parties. Then where does it leaves us? It is beyond imagination."

While Muslims have for decades smarted at the step-motherly treatment meted out by the Congress in Gujarat, they had no one else to turn to and the party was marginally better than BJP, evident from the handful of people they'd nominate from the community.

The number of Muslim lawmakers in the state legislature has dwindled from 12 in 1980 to two in 2012.

Essentially a two-party state, Gujarat never produced strong regional parties of the kind that emerged in states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Tamil Nadu. Even the Aam Aadmi Party, which received significant support from the Muslims when it entered Gujarat, quickly ran out of steam. Arvind Kejriwal's party drastically scaled down its efforts in the months leading up to the election.

Waqar Qazi, a human rights activist who lives in Juhapura, tells me, "I don't make a distinction between the Congress and the BJP anymore. Soft, hard, Hindutva is Hindutva. It doesn't matter that the Congress that is fielding a few more candidates than the BJP. It is about treating us like equal citizens and no party is doing that."

How can we get into the mainstream when both political parties have pushed us to the fringes.

'Rights not religion'

The younger generation of Muslims look at politics very differently from their parents and grandparents.

While all three generations have been touched by communal riots, young Muslims are moving beyond issues like rehabilitation and justice which have been the sole preoccupation of their elders. They want more from politics than just defeating the BJP. They also want future leaders from their community to do more than just distribute blankets, build houses and organize weddings.

During the course of our conversation, Nafees' wife, Azeema, who is a lawyer, tells me that she wants her political future to be defined by rights not religion. "We have decided to talk about our rights not our religion," she said.

Nafees chimed in, "Who do you think of going to when you want to know about the Muslim community. The Mufti or some religious leader? Today, there are hundreds of religious organizations in the Muslim community but not one that is working on civil rights. Why is that? How can we change it?"

"If someone burns a Koran, you will have every Muslim in the country coming out on the streets to protest. But people don't come out for their rights or to protest discrimination," he said.

If someone burns a Koran, you will have every Muslim in the country coming out on the streets to protest. But people don't come out for their rights or to protest discrimination.

When it comes to the much-touted "Gujarat Model" of development, economists are divided on its success and whether its fruits have trickled down to poorer sections of society including Muslims. Contrary to the rosy picture which has been painted about the state for over a decade, the state is lagging in key areas of health and eduction.

The one department in which the BJP has earned praise even from Muslims is law and order, but there is not denying the community's systemic exclusion from governance and administration. Not only are Muslim lawmakers absent from the ruling party, there are hardly any bureaucrats and police officials from the community. Also missing is a Ministry of Minority Affairs and a State Minorities Commission.

Nafees tells me, "This isn't just about Muslims. There is not a single clerk to be of service to 11 percent of the population."

There is not denying the community's systemic exclusion from governance and administration.

The "platform" that he launched in April, the Minority Coordination Committee, is meant to mobilize Muslims around a host of rights-based issues ranging from education to unemployment.

Over the summer, Muslims from Gujarat's 33 districts flooded the state government with over one lakh postcards carrying eight demands which included the setting up of a ministry of minority affairs in the state, allocation of funds for minorities in the annual budget, a state commission for minorities and establishing secondary schools in Muslim-dominated areas.

"We want a stake in a governance system. Politics is one part of it. For the past five years, our only demand has been that Muslims should get tickets to contest elections. That is very important but how can it be the only demand from a community that is so behind in areas such as employment and education," said Nafees.

We have decided to talk about our rights, not our religion.

Starting from zero

The rise of Hardik Patel and Jignesh Mevani from the Patidar and Dalit communities respectively has impressed young Muslims. While Patel has channeled the anger of a struggling section of Patidars over unemployment and agrarian distress, Mevani mobilized Dalits after seven members of their community were beaten up for skinning a dead cow.

Waqar, the human rights activist from Juhapuara, tells me that he too has toyed with the idea of entering politics. "Muslims would also like to see a Jignesh or even a Hardik come up from our community but it will take a long time. It is hard to come out of a blanket of fear. The Muslim middle class especially wants to protect itself," he said.

It isn't just fear and systemic exclusion that is holding back Muslims in Gujarat. Both Patel and Mevani have platforms from which they were able to launch their respective movements. Patel draws strength from an affluent community which knows how to articulate its demands and wield power. Mevani draws strength from a social movement that spans over 100 years, forged and fortified by reformers like Jyotirao Govindro Phule and BR Ambedkar.

Mevani draws strength from a social movement that spans over 100 years, forged and fortified by reformers like Jyotirao Govindro Phule and BR Ambedkar.

Young Muslims in Gujarat believe they have to start from "zero."

Shakeel Ahmed, a social activist from the Muslim neighborhood of Vatva, tells me, "Dalits feel casteism and they want to do something about it. They at least have the Atrocities Act to fall back on. Muslims have no social movement. We have a really long way to go."

Nafees, however, is optimistic about it taking less than a century. "We have to start from zero whether it is today or five years from now. But this is the 4G generation. We can fast track it."

Also on HuffPost India:

Here Are The 2018 Golden Globe Nominations

$
0
0

Hollywood woke up early Monday to announce the nominees for the 75th annual Golden Globe Awards. Presenters Alfre Woodard, Garrett Hedlund, Kristen Bell and Sharon Stone revealed the newly minted honorees from film and television at the Beverly Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills, California.

Tonya Harding pulled off the triple axel, but will Margot Robbie take home gold for her performance in “I, Tonya”? Or will Emma Stone build upon her awards momentum from last year and game, set, match the competition as Billie Jean King in “Battle of the Sexes”? Critically celebrated films like “Get Out,” “Call Me By Your Name” and “Dunkirk” are also expected to be recognized 

On the TV side, HBO’s not-so-limited series “Big Little Lies” could dominate in its categories after a nearly clean Emmys sweep earlier this year. The Globes are also likely to recognize Elisabeth Moss and the rest of “The Handmaid’s Tale” after a stellar (and terrifying) debut season on Hulu. Of course, as always, expect to bow down to “The Crown.”

The Globes, which honor the best in both movies and television, will air Jan. 7 on NBC, hosted by Seth Meyers.

FILM

Best Motion Picture, Drama

“Call Me By Your Name”

“The Shape of Water”

“Dunkirk”

“The Post”

“Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri”

Best Motion Picture, Musical, or Comedy

“Get Out”

“Lady Bird”

“The Disaster Artist”

“I, Tonya”

“The Greatest Showman”

Best Performance By an Actress in a Motion Picture, Drama

Meryl Streep, “The Post”

Sally Hawkins, “The Shape of Water”

Jessica Chastain, “Molly’s Game” 

Frances McDormand, “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri”

Michelle Williams, “All the Money in the World”

Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture, Drama

Timothée Chalamet, “Call Me by Your Name”

Daniel Day-Lewis, “Phantom Thread”

Tom Hanks, “The Post”

Gary Oldman, “Darkest Hour”

Denzel Washington, “Roman J. Israel, Esq.”

Best Performance By an Actress in a Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy

Judi Dench, “Victoria & Abdul”

Margot Robbie, “I, Tonya”

Saoirse Ronan, “Lady Bird”

Emma Stone, “Battle of the Sexes”

Helen Mirren, “The Leisure Seeker”

Best Performance By an Actor in a Motion Picture, Musical or Comedy

Steve Carell, “Battle of the Sexes”

Ansel Elgort, “Baby Driver”

James Franco, “The Disaster Artist”

Hugh Jackman, “The Greatest Showman”

Daniel Kaluuya, “Get Out”

Best Performance By an Actor in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture

Willem Dafoe, “The Florida Project”

Armie Hammer, “Call Me by Your Name”

Richard Jenkins, “The Shape of Water”

Christopher Plummer, “All the Money in the World”

Sam Rockwell, “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri”

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role in a Motion Picture

Mary J. Blige, “Mudbound”

Hong Chau, “Downsizing”

Allison Janney, “I, Tonya”

Laurie Metcalf, “Lady Bird”

Octavia Spencer, “The Shape of Water”

Best Director, Motion Picture

Guillermo del Toro, “The Shape of Water”

Martin McDonagh, “Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri”

Christopher Nolan, “Dunkirk”

Ridley Scott, “All The Money in the World”

Steven Spielberg, “The Post”

Best Screenplay

“The Shape of Water”

“Lady Bird”

“The Post”

“Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri”

“Molly’s Game”

Original Score, Motion Picture

“Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri”

“The Shape of Water”

“Phantom Thread”

“The Post”

“Dunkirk”

Best Original Song, Motion Picture

“Ferdinand” (“Home”)

“Mudbound” (“Mighty River”)

“Coco” (“Remember Me”)

“The Star” (“The Star”)

“The Greatest Showman” (“This Is Me”)

Best Motion Picture, Animated

“The Boss Baby”

“The Breadwinner”

“Ferdinand”

“Coco”

“Loving Vincent”

Best Motion Picture, Foreign Language

“A Fantastic Woman”

“First They Killed My Father”

“In the Fade”

“Loveless”

“The Square” 

TV

Claire Foy and Matt Smith in

Best Television Series, Drama

“The Crown”

“The Handmaid’s Tale”

“Game of Thrones”

“Stranger Things”

“This Is Us”

Best Television Series, Musical or Comedy

“Will & Grace”

“SMILF”

“Master of None”

“Black-ish”

“The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel”

Best Television Limited Series or Motion Picture Made for Television

“Big Little Lies”

“Fargo”

“Feud: Bette and Joan”

“Top of the Lake: China Girl”

“The Sinner” 

Best Performance by an Actress in a TV Series, Drama

Claire Foy, “The Crown”

Katherine Langford, “13 Reasons Why”

Elisabeth Moss, “The Handmaid’s Tale”

Maggie Gyllenhaal, “The Deuce”

Caitriona Balfe, “Outlander”

Best Performance By an Actor in a Television Series, Drama

Sterling K. Brown, “This is Us”

Freddie Highmore, “The Good Doctor”

Bob Odenkirk, “Better Call Saul”

Liev Schreiber, “Ray Donovan”

Jason Bateman, “Ozark”

Best Performance By an Actress in a Television Series, Musical, or Comedy

Issa Rae, “Insecure”

Rachel Brosnahan, “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel”

Alison Brie, “GLOW”

Frankie Shaw, “SMILF”

Pamela Adlon, “Better Things”

Best Performance By an Actor in a Television Series, Musical, or Comedy

Anthony Anderson, “Black-ish”

Kevin Bacon, “I Love Dick”

Aziz Ansari, “Master of None”

Eric McCormack, “Will & Grace”

William H. Macy, “Shameless”

Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role in a Series, Limited Series or Motion Picture Made for Television

Nicole Kidman, “Big Little Lies”

Jessica Lange, “Feud: Bette and Joan”

Reese Witherspoon, “Big Little Lies”

Jessica Biel, “The Sinner”

Susan Sarandon, “Feud: Bette and Joan”

Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role in a Series, Limited Series or Motion Picture Made for Television

Robert De Niro, “The Wizard of Lies”

Kyle MacLachlan, “Twin Peaks”

Ewan McGregor, “Fargo”

Jude Law, “The Young Pope”

Geoffrey Rush, “Genius”

Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role in a Series, Limited Series or Motion Picture Made for Television

Laura Dern, “Big Little Lies”

Ann Dowd, “The Handmaid’s Tale”

Chrissy Metz, “This is Us”

Michelle Pfeiffer, “The Wizard of Lies”

Shailene Woodley, “Big Little Lies”

Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role in a Series, Limited Series or Motion Picture Made for Television

Alfred Molina, “Feud”

Alexander Skarsgard, “Big Little Lies”

David Thewlis, “Fargo”

David Harbour, “Stranger Things”

Christian Slater, “Mr. Robot”

Also on HuffPost
Fall TV Preview

The Government Should Know Better Than Making Condoms Seem Like Dirty, Rotten Secrets

$
0
0

Right at that moment, my father would remember that he needed to count the loose change in his purse so that we couldn't sneak a few out to buy cigarettes. D's mother would inevitably forget if she had left anything to boil on the stove, and rush to the kitchen. P's parents took turns to stare at the wall clock or turn... no yank pages of a newspaper so loudly that it made that sharp, crunchy noise. A's father thought, that was the perfect time to bring up her lack of progress in algebra. However, a universal favourite with all our parents was staring at the ceiling fan with wide-eyed eagerness like it was about to pop Govinda in a shiny waistcoat. Sometime in the late 90s, one of our favourite lunchtime activities was discussing how our parents braved the apocalypse that was a condom commercial surfacing on the television when we were in the same room as them.

There was a pattern -- denial, distraction and in some cases, extreme mortification usually characterised by one or both parents being hit by a sudden avalanche of coughing or yawning or loud sighing. At 13, we barely knew what a condom exactly was -- what it looked like, what it was made of, what it's purpose was -- but we figured it was something that brought deep, gut-wrenching shame along with it. We were made to understand that it was some kind of a dirty little secret best left to surface and disappear from television screens as we held our breaths and hoped the moment would pass without touching our pristine little lives. Even when reproductive systems and birth control appeared on the pages of our text books, we were expected to regard the existence of the same, especially condoms, with a fair amount of contempt. At schools, at home, in peer groups huddled during lunch-breaks to guess which 'gross' person in our friend's building had dared to buy a pack, the empty box of which had landed in public view in their driveway -- scorn was supposed to be the only sentiment reserved for condoms or any discussion around it.

At 13, we barely knew what a condom exactly was -- what it looked like, what it was made of, what it's purpose was -- but we figured it was something that brought deep, gut-wrenching shame along with it.

Years later, none of this stopped people from having sex in high school or college. But they definitely stopped a fair share of my peers from practicing safe sex. From contracting STDs and popping pills based on hearsay to opting for secretive, unsafe abortions, women I know of have embraced tragedies far bigger than children apparently losing their childhood to condom commercials.

In a culture that relentlessly asks you to treat basic freedoms with deep suspicion, a condom was the harbinger of several tragedies. While everyone knew, technically it's meant to stem tragedies of various magnitudes -- unwanted pregnancies, sexually transmitted diseases and HIV -- we were actively encouraged to not acknowledge its existence with candour.

As women, we are especially burdened with several such 'shame generators' -- sanitary napkins, birth control medicines, pregnancy test kits in case we're not flaunting any obvious marker of having submitted to matrimony. Now since no one said life's going to be an extended shampoo commercial, at most times, we simply roll our eyes, shake our heads and count hours till the day the world decides to emerge from under the rock it loves living under.

From contracting STDs and popping pills based on hearsay to opting for secretive, unsafe abortions, women I know of have embraced tragedies far bigger than children apparently losing their childhood to condom commercials.

However, even that becomes incredibly more difficult when the government -- a democratically elected body -- decides to behave like a queasy, complaining neighbour who is more repulsed by people who have sex than perhaps by those who urinate on walls.

Recently, at the behest of the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI), the Information of Broadcasting Ministry has issued a guideline restricting the screening of condom ads on television between 10pm and 6am. The decision, it has been argued by the government, was taken keeping in mind that children watch television and must not be exposed -- and this is where the logic gets fuzzy -- anything 'indecent'. Invoking a rule laid down in 1994, which seeks to protect children from viewing anything that is '"indecent, vulgar, suggestive, repulsive or offensive themes or treatment", the decision of strike off condom ads from prime time television was taken.

In a country which has an alarming rate of adolescent pregnancies, the government just made a method of birth control sound like a vulgar prcatice that shouldn't be normalised in our casual, everyday conversations. Take a moment to curb the urge to remind the powers-that-be which century this is and then introduce them of a fantastic aspect of our lives called science.

Effectively, by associating condom ads with words such as 'vulgar', 'indecent', 'offensive', the government isn't protecting children from anything, but endorsing every myth about sex, shoving youngsters towards unsafe, guilty sex steeped in shame and self-doubt. Earlier this year, it was reported that at least 10 women die every year from resorting to unsafe abortions. By trying to paint a method of safe sex as a practice that's essentially morally dubious, the government is simply patting patriarchy on its back, almost saying that as long as our famed sanskaar is in place, doesn't matter if a few young lives fall off the rails.

Earlier this year, it was reported that at least 10 women die every year from resorting to unsafe abortions.

The advertising council has told The Indian Express that they had received various complaints about the timings of the commercials. While they didn't find the contents objectionable, they forwarded the complaints to the ministry to take a call on the same. It is not clear if the council is under any compulsion to immediately act on complaints registered by consumers, but it seems this was a issue they were very keen on resolving. Though the government wasn't worried about children getting misleading ideas about what constitutes 'beauty' from fairness cream ads, the council had themselves issued guidelines on what commercials cannot portray while trying to peddle a skin lightening products. Similarly, the council could have come up with guidelines that compel brands and advertisers to think out of the box and not resort to sleaze in order to make a commercial on condoms. Or perhaps restrict ads that choose to focus exclusively on sexual pleasure to play at a non-prime time slot.

If the complainants, who the council and the government decided to take seriously, had a problem with the very fact of sex, they're the problems at hand, not condoms, or commercials promoting them. You'd think, a government -- a body of individuals tasked to run a country of billions -- would know better than indulging such infantile 'concerns'. But alas, it's the same one that wouldn't screen a film at a festival because it had 'sexy' in the title.

P.S. If you're a parent and struggling to impart sex education to your child, here's a list of useful resources that has more answers than the ceiling fan or the government of the country has.

'It's Like Hell': Inside Libya's EU-Backed Abuse Of Migrants

$
0
0
Migrants arrive at a naval base in Tripoli after they were intercepted by the Libyan Coast Guard on Dec. 8.

European governments are actively supporting the Libyan Coast Guard in its abusive campaign against refugees and migrants, while ignoring repeated warnings about the agency’s history of corruption, Amnesty International charged in a scathing new report on Monday.

Libyan authorities are accused of beating, torturing, extorting, trafficking and otherwise exploiting migrants, backed by European Union member states intent on curbing trans-Mediterranean migration.

The International Organization for Migration’s latest figures count more than 416,500 migrants in Libya, which is a major transit hub for African migrants attempting to reach European shores. The actual number is likely to be much higher, according to Amnesty.

A recent video of an alleged modern-day slave auction in Libya, where African migrants were reportedly being sold for a few hundred dollars each, stoked international outrage and drew attention to the country’s critical state of instability. Although the auction was allegedly run by Libyan militias, a United Nations report from June found that the country’s coast guard and its Department to Counter Illegal Migration (DCIM) are “directly involved” in the enslavement of migrants.

With ships, training and sustained funding from the EU, the Amnesty report said, Libya’s coast guard works to intercept refugees and migrants at sea. It returns them to detention centers across the country, where some 20,000 men, women and children are currently imprisoned.

In these unsanitary, overcrowded centers, which are run by the DCIM, detainees allegedly endure “horrific” conditions and ill treatment, according to Amnesty. For many, the only escape is through illegal payments to guards and smugglers.

In interviews with Amnesty, dozens of migrants and refugees described a system of collusion between guards, smugglers and the Libyan Coast Guard:

Detention center guards regularly torture detainees to extort money, releasing those that can pay, and sometimes passing them on to smugglers who secure their departure from Libya in cooperation with the coast guard. Agreements between the coast guard and smugglers are signaled by markings on boats that allow specific vessels to pass through Libyan waters without interception, and the coast guard has also been known to escort boats out to international waters.

“It’s like hell,” a former detainee told Amnesty, describing the camps. “You never see the light of the sun. You are closed in a room, locked, each with a toilet. Rooms are packed ― no space to sleep on the floor at the same time.”

It’s unclear how many members of the coast guard collaborate with smugglers, Amnesty noted, but increased European support has enabled the coast guard to intercept more migrants over the past year. So far in 2017, it has captured 19,452 people en route to Europe and taken them to Libyan detention centers.

Christopher Daniel, a 20-year-old Nigerian, was among a group of more than 150 migrants on a rubber boat stopped by the Libyan Coast Guard in November.

“I suffered a lot ― kidnappings, demands for ransom,” he told Reuters of his failed journey to Italy. “I don’t know what to say or do. All the money I have wasted ― what will I tell my parents?”

U.N. human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein called the situation “an outrage to the conscience of humanity” in a statement last month. “The European Union’s policy of assisting the Libyan coast guard to intercept and return migrants in the Mediterranean [is] inhuman,” he said.

A review by the U.K. Independent Commission for Aid Impact sounded alarm back in March that the Libyan Coast Guard was “deliver[ing] migrants back to a system that leads to indiscriminate and indefinite detention and denies refugees their right to asylum.”

But British officials have ignored such warnings “time and time again,” Amnesty asserted in its report.

“By supporting the Libyan authorities in trapping people in Libya, without requiring the Libyan authorities to tackle the endemic abuse of refugees and migrants or to even recognize that refugees exist, European governments have shown where their true priorities lie: namely the closure of the central Mediterranean route, with scant regard to the suffering caused,” said John Dalhuisen, Amnesty’s Europe director. “They are complicit in these crimes.” 

The 18 Best Movies Of 2017

$
0
0

The movie year started when Allison Williams dangled those car keys in “Get Out.” The same weekend that Jordan Peele’s horror-satire become an instant phenomenon, “Moonlight” snatched the Best Picture trophy away from “La La Land.” It was a chaotic, thrilling moment that heralded what was to come: a batch of films that would provide prescient commentary on our chaotic, not-so-thrilling national mood. Of course, some instead offered needed respites, letting us laugh or swoon or scream to escape our collective woes. 

All in all, it was a swell year for movies, even if Hollywood’s big blockbusters proved less and less reliable. Across many genres, filmmakers captured snapshots of humanity that rang out with poise: gay love stories, delicious battles of the sexes, testaments to overcoming adversity, odes to other species, meditations about poltergeists wearing bedsheets. If you knew where to look, the magic of cinema was all around, no matter the horrorspouring outof the industry that supports it.

I’ve seen close to everything, and I am delighted to bring you another ranking of the year’s best. This is, of course, a subjective list full of omissions. But I hope there’s comfort or amusement in the recommendations curated below. I had a magical time watching (and, in many cases, rewatching) each of these. I hope you will, too.

  • 18"The Disaster Artist"
    A24
    Which aspect of "The Disaster Artist" is right for you? The James Franco resurgence that accompanies it? The bizarro Hollywood morsel it depicts? The sprightly buddy comedy that undergirds the movie? Whatever it is, this behind-the-scenes account about Tommy Wiseau, the mythologized cult director responsible for "The Room," is the year's most infectious experience. Its humor envelops the audience, jokes lingering well past their punchlines. Franco goes above the call of a standard biopic performance, reinterpreting Tommy as a clueless oddball try-hard whose unplaceable Eastern European accent maybe has a bit of an endearing side. There's more to Wiseau, of course, but "The Disaster Artist" airs on the side of affection. And that's OK -- it's testament to the sheer fun of movies.
  • 17"The Big Sick"
    Amazon Studios
    In terms of pure watchability, it's hard to top "The Big Sick." Heralding a new age for the romantic comedy, this semi-autobiographical dramatization of Kumail Nanjiani and wife Emily V. Gordon's cross-cultural love story is a mile-a-minute joy with a piquant melancholy at its core. It's at once a snapshot of the immigrant experience in America, a testament to young love and an uproarious look at the tug-of-war that exists within families. It also features Holly Hunter (fiery, affectionate, drunk) and Ray Romano (pensive, regretful, huggable) as the year's best on-screen parents.
  • 16"mother!"
    Paramount Pictures
    Whether you think "mother!" is an intoxicating provocation or maddening nonsense, surely we can agree it's the year's most electrifying conversation piece. Paramount rolled the dice, releasing Darren Aronofsky's enigmatic project on some 2,400 screens -- far too many for a genre-agnostic allegory about religion, ecology, the artistic process, marital discord and home invasions. Featuring Javier Bardem, a career-best Jennifer Lawrence, Ed Harris and devilish MVP Michelle Pfeiffer, "mother!" begins with a tentative creep and crescendoes toward a fever pitch that's as exasperating as it is exhilarating. How wonderful. Just make sure your sinks are braced.
  • 15"Star Wars: The Last Jedi"
    Disney
    The chief joy of the new "Star Wars" trilogy -- other than the porgs -- is seeing characters meet or reunite. "The Last Jedi" has plenty of meetings and reunions, and a few goodbyes, too -- all of which will make you squeal or cheer or cry or gasp in the ways that only this franchise can. It's easy to see why Disney has entrusted director Rian Johnson to create a new trilogy: He has a thrilling eye for visuals and a keen sense of character humor. The galaxy far, far away is getting a slick upgrade.
  • 14"War for the Planet of the Apes"
    20th Century Fox
    The monkey movies shouldn't have been this good, but somehow "War for Planet of the Apes" was even more existential and thrilling than its two predecessors. In the snowy Sierra mountains, our graceful hero (Andy Serkis) fought the final stages of a battle pitting humans against a simian species that only ever wanted peace. Invoking shades of "Apocalypse Now," the Western genre and the Book of Exodus, Matt Reeves' exceptional threequel proves that Hollywood's franchises can capture a director's subdued vision and still remain both balletic and invigorating.
  • 13"Phantom Thread"
    Focus Features
    At first, "Phantom Thread" seems like another movie about a fussy artist and his subservient muse. Then Paul Thomas Anderson rips the cloak off the story's lush facade, turning it into an unlikely romantic comedy that remains both intimate and grand. It's a portrait of the strange idiosyncrasies of coupledom: a touch of silky melodrama here, a bit of unlikely sadomasochism there. The movie evolves across its two-hour runtime, giving Anderson his finest masterwork since "There Will Be Blood," the director's other shrewd collaboration with Daniel Day-Lewis, who will surely be missed if his impending retirement persists.
  • 12"Faces Places"
    Cohen Media Group
    Movies that collect year-end accolades tend to be somber, heady affairs that cut into humanity's truths. "Faces Places" reaches the same endpoint without any of the leaden weightiness. It is, simply, irresistible. French New Wave virtuoso Agnés Varda and photographer JR make a delightful duo, traversing the less glamorous plains of France for slice-of-life portraits of everyday folks making tiny impressions on their surroundings. Much like "Cameraperson" last year, this documentary seems to find itself as it unfolds. Each stop along Varda and JR's road trip leads to an exploration of hard work, unavoidable aging and improbable appreciation for the simple things in life. In a year filled with horrors, "Faces Places" is ecstasy.
  • 11"The Post"
    20th Century Fox
    Much has been, and will be, said of the old-fashioned craftsmanship that Steven Spielberg maintains in the fifth decade of his career. In the best possible sense, "The Post" would be at home with a handful of films from the 1970s, and not only because it resembles "All the President's Men." Rarely does a movie about a process -- in this case, The Washington Post's process in publishing the classified Pentagon Papers -- feel this alive. It hardly matters if the characters, like Kay Graham (Meryl Streep) and Ben Bradlee (Tom Hanks), proclaim the movie's themes so blatantly they might as well be speaking into megaphones. Spielberg and company fast-tracked this movie in March; nine short months later, the results are a rousing ode to a free press, fair workplaces and red-hot risk-takers.
  • 10"A Fantastic Woman"
    Sony Pictures Classics
    On a particularly blustery day, the heroine of "A Fantastic Woman" treks through a windstorm so powerful she can hardly stand upright. She thrusts her body into a gust, unable to move as debris flutters through the air and an aria serenades the scene. It's one of numerous surreal interludes in this melodic Chilean drama about a transgender opera singer who refuses to let adversity victimize her. Daniela Vega is masterful as the story's protagonist, contending with the sudden death of her romantic partner, whose family refuses to let her attend his funeral. What starts as a tale of heartbreak ends as a beautiful, soaring reflection of the struggles that make one woman stronger, more fantastic.
  • 9"The Beguiled"
    Focus Features
    Sofia Coppola has done it again. In "The Beguiled," she dresses a tart comedy of manners in shades of Southern Gothic horror. The heroes are a tribe of horny ladies nursing a wounded Union soldier at a Civil War-era boarding school lucky enough to call Nicole Kidman its brittle matriarch. This is the plottiest, genre-iest of Coppola's six movies, but she employs her signature introspection, capturing candlelit repression and sun-drenched stupor, replete with the line of the year, delivered in a flurry of delirium: "Edwina, bring me the anatomy book."
  • 8"God's Own Country"
    Samuel Goldwyn Films
    Farm life has never been this titillating. The pastoral plains of Yorkshire aren't kind to a repressed lad (Josh O'Connor) tasked with tending to his stony father's land, where the only distractions from his self-loathing are hard drinking and cold sex. "God's Own Country" is "Brokeback Mountain" without the melodrama: A Romanian migrant worker (Alec Secareanu) arrives to help with the year's lambing season, in turn introducing our protagonist to the throes of unexpected romance. Everything in France Lee's psalm -- from tacit glances to muddy fornication -- unfolds with the utmost restraint, as if it's listening to the characters' quiet inner lives and announcing, finally, that they've been heard.
  • 7"A Ghost Story"
    A24
    "A Ghost Story" may invite comparisons to Terrence Malick, Virginia Woolf, "Boyhood" and "Ugetsu," but it's a singular feat that needs no antecedents. Often wordless and always elliptical, David Lowery's feature-length ballad interrogates grief, the passage of time and the roles we play in the lives of our closest companions. The central couple's quotidian conflicts are put to rest when one member (Casey Affleck) dies in a car crash, returning as a bedsheet-clad specter traipsing around the home he once shared with his wife (Rooney Mara). From there, the movie weaves through time, gently probing what happens to a soul once the body it inhabited perishes. It doesn't purport to answer life's big questions, instead finding peace in the search for meaning. Can you sense from this writing that it's a hard concept to describe? You're right, and the film is all the better for it. Rarely is the afterlife explored with such divine, peerless grace.
  • 6"Lady Bird"
    A24
    On the surface, "Lady Bird" is a simple coming-of-age story, charting the wanderlust of a restless high school senior (Saoirse Ronan). It belongs to a genre that often feels played out, but Greta Gerwig mines her own Sacramento biography for a poignant spin on mother-daughter crosshairs, middle-class disillusionment and the bittersweet release of growing up. The jokes sing, just like the teenagers staging a school production of Stephen Sondheim's "Merrily We Roll Along." That we get to be in the audience for both is one of the 2017's treats.
  • 5"Get Out"
    Universal Pictures
    If any movie this year was a true phenomenon, it was "Get Out," Jordan Peele's biting satire about white minds preying on black bodies. In crafting his race parable, Peele also deconstructed the horror genre, using its tropes to stoke audiences' nerves. We laughed because we knew how a conventional thriller would unfold, and that made us anxious, with all those ostensibly well-meaning liberals up to no damn good. Featuring a star-making turn by Daniel Kaluuya, playing a big-city photographer meeting his white girlfriend's wealthy family, "Get Out," for better or worse, became an apropos commencement for post-Obama America.
  • 4"Okja"
    Netflix
    Whether you see it on a big or small screen, "Okja" is a marvel. Pet movies are a sure bet in Hollywood, but rarely are they this sprawling and well-observed. From flowery South Korea to industrial New York City, the journey young Mija (Ahn Seo-hyun) accepts to retrieve her super-pig BFF butts up against rapacious corporate overlords, militaristic activists and media frenzy. Director Bong Joon-ho lightens the dystopian undertones that defined his previous films "Snowpiercer" and "The Host," landing on something refreshingly optimistic. Along the way, he composes a thrilling adventure, brilliantly photographed by Darius Khondji. This is the stuff summer blockbusters should be made of.
  • 3"The Shape of Water"
    Fox Searchlight
    Guillermo del Toro, first and foremost a creature-feature whiz kid, betrays his sensitive side with "The Shape of Water," a spellbinding love story that unites a mute janitor (Sally Hawkins) in Cold War-era Baltimore with a mysterious Amazonian fish-man (Doug Jones) kidnapped for government prodding. Only a master can make an inter-species sonnet this splendid. With an old-fashioned sweep and a cast of characters (Richard Jenkins! Octavia Spencer! Michael Stuhlbarg!) who fit together like pieces of a weary puzzle, this resplendent achievement turns otherness into a fairy tale. How lovely.
  • 2"The Florida Project"
    A24
    Sean Baker earned his directorial clout with 2015's "Tangerine," a stormy comedy that looked like a million bucks (and then some), despite being shot on iPhones with a nonprofessional cast. Baker one-upped himself with "The Florida Project," a blissfully ambling jewel that also tells a story of marginalization. With a buoyant spirit and a trenchant sense of heartache, a hard-up mother (Bria Vinaite, discovered on Instagram) and her mouthy 6-year-old daughter (Brooklynn Prince) bide their summer days at a budget motel near Disney World. Adventures turn into misadventures, and the vibrant hues of magic hour fade as the future suddenly knocks on their violet door. This distinctly American tale knows how to find treasure in what some will call trash: with a fizz of fanciful bliss.
  • 1"Call Me by Your Name"
    Sony Pictures Classics
    Maybe once or twice a year, a movie will come along that I adore so much it seeps into my soul. That's how I felt about "Jackie" last year, and about "Carol" and "Mad Max: Fury Road" the year before. The only parallel from 2017 is "Call Me by Your Name," the most blissful heartache ever to saunter across the screen. Nestled in the Italian countryside during one lush summer, a love story springs to life, first in furtive gestures and finally with profound euphoria. Timothée Chalamet gave the year's finest performance, playing a bookish 17-year-old who jumps at the chance to be tour guide and companion for Armie Hammer's strapping grad student. Their connection builds slowly, steadily, sensually. Life is but a dream in this adaption of André Aciman's celebrated novel, directed by Luca Guadagnino and written by James Ivory, who treat the central courtship like a feature-length Sufjan Stevens ballad. From the fertile opening shots to the ravishing close-up that concludes the film, "Call Me by Your Name" is an enrapturing experience, like a melancholy dream that sends you floating into the enchanted, unwritten future.

Honorable mentions: 

  • “BPM (Beats Per Minute” (director Robin Campillo)
  • “Colossal” (director Nacho Vigalondo)
  • “Girls Trip” (director Malcolm D. Lee)
  • “Good Time” (directors Josh Safdie and Benny Safdie)
  • “Kedi” (director Ceyda Torun)
  • “The Lost City of Z” (director James Gray)
  • “The Lovers” (director Azazel Jacobs)
  • “The Meyerowitz Stories (New and Selected)” (director Noah Baumbach)
  • “Mudbound” (director Dee Rees)

North Korean Prisons Are Worse Than Nazi Concentration Camps, Says Holocaust Survivor

$
0
0

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un’s mistreatment of political prisoners is at least as egregious as that carried out in World War II concentration camps, according to a former international judge who survived Auschwitz. 

Thomas Buergenthal, a law professor who served for a decade as an International Court of Justice judge, said a new report he helped write documenting atrocities in North Korea’s prisons shows the Kim regime may be “even worse” than Nazis.

“I believe that the conditions in the [North] Korean prison camps are as terrible, or even worse, than those I saw and experienced in my youth in these Nazi camps and in my long professional career in the human rights field,” Buergenthal, who endured the Auschwitz and Sachsenhausen concentration camps a child, told The Washington Post. 

Buergenthal is an author of a report published Tuesday by the International Bar Association, "Inquiry on Crimes Against Humanity in North Korean Political Prisons. It documents atrocities inside the country’s prisons, where an estimated 80,000 to 130,000 people are being held.

The report is based on testimony from North Korean defectors, including a former prison guard, and scholarly research, videos and transcripts. It says investigators found evidence of crimes against humanity that have been committed in the prisons, including murder, extermination, enslavement, forcible transfer, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution and enforced disappearances. 

The report focuses on North Korea’s four “total control zones,” where people are sent with no prospect of release. “Hundreds of thousands of political prisoners have been sent to political prisons over the past 50 years, with up to three generations of families detained together and forced into slave labor, mostly to work in mines, logging and agriculture,” the report says.

Prisoners are regularly tortured and killed, according to the report. It says rape is rampant, as is malnutrition, starvation and overwork. 

“There is not a comparable situation anywhere in the world, past or present,” Navi Pillay, another report author who also is a judge in South Africa, told the Post. “This is really an atrocity at the maximum level, where the whole population is subject to intimidation.”

The report calls for an international tribunal to investigate North Korea’s crimes against humanity and to hold accountable those responsible, including Kim, party officials, prison guards and security officials. 

“Given North Korea’s tightly controlled leadership structure, Kim Jong Un and his inner circle warrant prosecution under the principle of command responsibility,” the report says.

The study serves as an unofficial update to a 2014 United Nations inquiry on human rights abuses in North Korea, the International Bar Association said. 

The North Korean regime’s policy of detaining people it views as enemy “seeds” dates back to the 1950s. But accurately documenting crimes inside the country’s prisons has been hampered by North Korea’s isolation, even as it develops a nuclear arsenal.

President Donald Trump has responded to the nuclear program with bellicose threats and demands that China take responsibility, as one of North Korea’s sole allies. China will reportedly open refugee camps on its border with the rogue regime to house defectors.

Also on HuffPost
Secret Photos Show The Real North Korea

Kirk Douglas Rings In 101st Birthday With Son Michael And Famous Family

$
0
0

There are legends, and then there’s Kirk Douglas, who’s still golden after all these years. The actor celebrated his 101st birthday on Sunday with a bash paying tribute to his iconic screen roles. 

Douglas was joined by wife, Anne, 98, and sons, Michael and Joel, as well as granddaughter Kelsey, for his big day. 

“My brother Joel and I attend a family celebration for Kirk’s 101st birthday on Saturday,” Michael Douglas captioned a touching post on Facebook. “At 101 Dad is a true amazement and a great time was had by all.”

The family went all out for the special day, with a Vincent van Gogh-themed birthday cake to reference Douglas’ role in the 1956 film “Lust for Life” about the artist. 

Another cake was crafted to look like two boxing gloves à la “Champion,” the film that earned Douglas his first Academy Award nomination for playing a ruthless fighter. The cake’s sweet inscription read, “Happy Birthday to the Champion.”

Douglas’ daughter-in-law Catherine Zeta-Jones, who’s been married to Michael Douglas for 17 years, sent her love over social media, as she was not at the party. 

“101 today!!!! My darling Pappy on my knee,” the actress captioned a photo of them together. “Happy Birthday to my wonderful, inspirational and loving father in law, Kirk. Love you with all my heart.”

Dylan Douglas, Michael Douglas and Catherine Zeta-Jones’ son, also wished his grandfather a happy birthday and shared a heartwarming photo.

“Happy birthday 101 years and still sexy love you with all my heart Pappy,” Dylan wrote.

A post shared by Dylan Douglas (@dy1and) on

Last year, Douglas celebrated the big 100 with guests like director Steven Spielberg and comedian Don Rickles, who joined his family for an all-star bash in Beverly Hills. The Oscar winner reportedly made a dramatic entrance into the party to the theme from “Rocky.” 

“One of the things that I find most incredible about dad is the third act of his life,” Michael said at the celebration. “After all he accomplished in his professional career and what he’s given for his country, at the point in his life where he’s faced adversity, losing a son, having a helicopter crash, having a stroke, and what he’s accomplished in this third act in his life, I find quite extraordinary.”

Here’s to 102, Kirk!

Also on HuffPost
Celebrity News & Photos: 2017

50 World Leaders Gather In Paris For Climate Summit. Trump Was Not Invited.

$
0
0
President Donald Trump pictured in the White House on December 11, 2017. Trump was not invited to attend a global climate conference that's being held in Paris this week. 

On Tuesday, the two-year anniversary of the adoption of the historic Paris Agreement, 50 world leaders planned to gather in the French capital to attend an invite-only climate change conference hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron, the World Bank and the United Nations. In attendance will be British Prime Minister Theresa May, Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto, UN Secretary-General António Guterres and World Bank President Jim Yong Kim, among other global leaders and heads of state.

There, however, will be one conspicuous absence: Donald Trump.

Macron had said pointedly in November that he had not extended an invitation to Trump, who in June announced plans to withdraw the U.S. from the Paris climate accord. Macron said that he could be persuaded to change his mind about the invitation if Trump showed a willingness to “join the club” to fight global warming.

As Time magazine noted on Monday, however, Trump has expressed little interest in shifting his climate change stance. His administration continues to champion fossil fuels and has actively taken steps to unravel policies enacted during former President Barack Obama’s tenure to limit greenhouse gas emissions. 

Tuesday’s conference, dubbed the One Planet Summit, aims to mobilize public and private financing to fund the global transition to a carbon-free future. Other than the 50 world leaders, 4,000 other participants and 800 organizations are expected to attend. 

Trump may not be attending the conference but other Americans will be there.

California Gov. Jerry Brown, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former Secretary of State John Kerry are among the attendees.

Arnold Schwarzenegger, the famed actor and former California governor, is also attending the summit, according to the Associated Press. The Austrian-American was quoted as saying this week that it doesn’t matter whether Trump is on board with the climate accord or not, “because companies, scientists and other governments can ‘pick up the slack’ to reduce global emissions.”

Macron on Monday announced the recipients of new climate change grants proposed in the wake of Trump’s decision, dubbed his “Make Our Planet Great Again” program. The researchers, most of whom are U.S.-based, will now have the option to relocate to France to continue their research. 

Macron told the grant winners that France "will be there to replace" U.S. support for climate science.

Also on HuffPost

9 Star Wars: The Last Jedi Reviews Round Up From 'Disappointment' To 'Stupendous'

$
0
0

Us mere mortals have to wait a few more days for the latest Star Wars instalment but a lucky few people are catching a glimpse of its stars at the premiere in London this evening.

Just look how much fun they’re having - sickening.

Pff.

Anyway, we can at least get a good impression of how Star Wars: The Last Jedi has gone down with the critics.

'Star Wars' The Last Jedi: London Premiere In Pictures

You Can Now Follow Hashtags On Instagram

$
0
0

Instagram has rolled out what might be one of its simplest, and yet most important changes to its app since it was first unveiled in 2010.

You can now follow hashtags as well as human beings.

Now, rather than finding someone that takes pictures of a subject you’re interested in you can simply pick the appropriate hashtag (#onthetable, #architecture or #floralnails) and then see all the images related to that hashtag in your main feed.

So how does it work? Well it’s just like finding and following a human being.

You simply search for the hashtag you’re interested in and then you’ll see a list of the most relevant results.

When you find one you like you simply tap on it to bring up its own profile page which you can then follow.

What you’re seeing is not every single photo taken in real-time with that hashtag, instead you’ll be seeing the top performing posts and then some curated Instagram Stories that are related to that hashtag.

You’ll also be able to see the hashtags that your friends follow by going to their profile page which yes, means that anyone who follows you can also see the hashtags you follow.

If you have a private profile your hashtags will only be visible to the people that you’ve let follow you.

Instagram is rolling the feature out to its 800+ million followers right now so don’t panic if it hasn’t appeared in your app just yet.

Anita Rani Reveals How 'Who Do You Think You Are?' Empowered Her And 'Changed Her Life'

$
0
0

Anita Rani has credited ‘Who Do You Think You Are?’ with “changing my life”, after taking part in the series back in 2015. 

Anita’s episode was one of the most moving in the show’s history, as viewers saw her learn about how her ancestors’ lives during the partition of India, discovering her grandfather’s first wife ended her own life when her village came under attack

In the two years since she explored her family history on the programme, the ‘Countryfile’ presenter has - in her words - been “galvanised to use my voice” to support various causes. 

“It made me realise that I am the first generation ever, in my family, to have a choice about my life,” she told HuffPost UK. “On ‘Who Do You Think You Are?’, we discovered about the partition of India and how women took their own lives, or their lives were taken by the men in them.

Anita Rani 

“I discovered all of this outrageous stuff about how little say women had in their own lives, so it really empowered me to want to use my platform and my voice.

“And I’m really lucky that I’m living at a time when this is all on the agenda, and about time too really.

“We need more women in positions of power, that is what absolutely needs to change.”

Anita then explored the events in greater detail with a two-part documentary, ‘My Family, Partition and Me: India 1947’, which she describes as “so extreme and so raw, and deeply personal, and horrific”.

“It was just pure emotion that I probably wouldn’t have shown in my real life,” she admitted. “I had the most remarkable response to it and that in itself was really heartening, everyone saying ‘my god, thank you for showing that story’.

“It’s a real moment in my career to have made that programme.

“I’m delighted that the BBC commissioned it really, and put it on BBC One. It was really important for them to have done that.”

Anita is ending 2017 by voicing her support for a new campaign, which calls for companies to create an equal dress code for genders in the workplace. 

Discussing her own experiences of feeling pressure to present herself in a certain way while working in television, she said: “I didn’t have a lipstick until I started working as a presenter.

“The first time I got a lipstick was when I got my first TV job, because I felt that’s what people do, you wear make-up on television.

“And I often got it wrong, [with] the stress I put myself under, just thinking about what to wear for different jobs I had in the past.

“It’s got better now as I’ve got older, but it can still be very stressful.

“Women’s clothes are always noticed on television but we don’t really care about what men are wearing.”

Anita also pointed out the effect seemingly flippant comments on women’s clothing or make-up can have, not just for television presenters but also those in more traditional, office environments.

Women have just got on with it in the work environment and learnt to deal with comments, but actually they can be very detrimental,” she said. “They can hurt your feelings, knock your confidence, make you feel confused. All sorts of reactions can come off the back of one flippant comment.” 

Anita Rani was speaking in support of totaljobs and their campaign highlighting the impact that office dress codes have on employee well-being.

Viewing all 37409 articles
Browse latest View live